Caremark: Our New Doctor

by Karoli on January 31, 2006 · 13 comments

Caremark is the gateway to our prescription coverage.  They decide what medications our insurance will cover in part, and what medications will not be covered.  Then there is the “in-between” — those medications subject to “prior authorization”.  I’ve written about this before, but I’m going to do it again since there seems to be a widening disconnect between our doctor, common sense, and our health insurer.  Perhaps they will ‘get it’ if enough people complain.

Sticks has been on the same dose of Adderall XR for nearly 3 years.  In all of that time, the insurance company has managed to duck any co-coverage with me, leaving me with an out-of-pocket bill of $140/month.  There is no other medication that we have tried which has the same efficacy, lack of side effects, and long-lasting effect as this one.  It has enabled him to put all of his attention into personal, musical and academic success.  By that, I mean that it mitigates his hyperactive mind and body and allows him the luxury of focus for the pursuits that he chooses as his pathways to success.

His doctor evaluates him on a regular basis.  We pay for those 10-minute med checks, too.  This year, I decided to push back on the “prior authorization” denial.  After all, they’ve approved ME…why should they deny him?  In order to do this, I have to take him in for a full examination again (we just did this a month ago) and then my doctor has to take time out of his day to write a lengthy appeal as to why this particular medication should be approved for use by my son.

As you read this, keep in mind the following:

  1. Adderall XR is one of the top approved medications for ADHD in teens.
  2. Studies prove that ADHD is not a “little kid” or “school disorder”.  It is a life disorder that requires management, often through medication and always through life.  Sticks is not at a point yet where, by his own admission, he is ready to manage life without the focus afforded by medication. 
  3. We have tried generic medications, cheaper medications, etc.  Ritalin does not work and kills his appetite.  I will not put him on Strattera because I’ve seen too many reports of the possibility that there may be long-term issues that haven’t been studied long enough.  Concerta isn’t even on the “prior authorization” list — it’s denied outright.  He was on it; it worked nicely.  We switched to AdderallXR in the hopes of getting some sort of co-coverage
  4. Even with a copayment, we will be out of pocket 40%, so we are still assuming a substantial chunk of the cost

This morning we received a flat denial.  There is an appeals process and we will do it, but I’m furious about it, because by flatly refusing to consider coverage of this medication, Caremark has inserted themselves between me and my doctor.  They’ve done it without so much as an office visit.

My doctor is on the preferred providers list.  I trust him.  He has treated our family for 12 years.  He’s a good, solid, responsive family practitioner who has a large, healthy practice.  He isn’t being sued.  He isn’t a shyster.  He’s a trusted part of our overall healthcare scheme.  Further, Sticks was diagnosed and treated for 2 years by a psychiatrist who specialized in ADHD and was referred back to our family doctor after the firm diagnosis and medication stabilization process.  This wasn’t a random diagnosis — it was carefully and thoughtfully made.

I didn’t hire Caremark to make my doctors’ decisions.  I trust my doctor to make those decisions.  Caremark doesn’t know me, doesn’t know Sticks, hasn’t ever looked at Sticks’ chart, taken his blood pressure, his temperature, treated his ear infections, kid injuries, asthma and coughs, hasn’t watched Sticks march in the local parade as drum captain and applauded that success, hasn’t got a chart 3 inches thick with stuff they’ve done for years and years and years. If any doctor practiced medicine the way that Caremark does, the patients would run as fast as they could to a provider who cared more about them than the bottom line.

Money and medicine don’t always mix.  Simple as that.  But I pay my premiums, have never had a prolonged hospital stay, pay my copayments, and my employer contributes a large chunk, too.  For that, Caremark should be OBLIGATED to respect my doctor’s decisions about medications, treatments, and what is right for my kid WITHOUT QUESTION.  There is no basis for them to become the ‘second opinion’ on this.  We already have a first and second opinion.  Theirs is simply punitive.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • http://www.growingupgifted.blogspot.com The Princess Mom

    Push back! Good for you! Our insurance has decided to double our co-pay for non-generic medications, when the meds we really need don’t come in generics. Highway robbery!

    I’m sorry your son can’t take Concerta. It’s worked really well for Klaus.

  • http://lizditz.typepad.com liz

    I nominated this post to Grand Rounds, and it is in.

    http://sciencepolitics.blogspot.com/2006/02/grand-rounds.html

  • http://acid-test.blogspot.com/ quixote

    Your story is repeated heartbreakingly many times, in so many different ways, all the way up to life-threatening and beyond. I find it sad, in a way, that you feel the need to say you pay plenty yourself. This should be totally irrelevant, but our system is so focused on chasing down freeloaders, instead of helping the sick, that I can understand your feelings. And the really stupid part is that chasing non-existent freeloaders costs money. All the effort Caremark spent on not-helping you would have probably paid for a year’s worth of medicines. But I’m sure this way it looks better to the shareholders. I mean, why would a for-profit company care about profit, right?

  • http://drumsnwhistles.com drumsnwhistles

    Liz, thank you!

    Quixote, yes, and they’re turning quite the profit, too. I truly believe that they are capricious in their denial of benefits and should be made accountable for it.

  • Pingback: Caremark Writes at odd time signatures

  • LFT

    Caremark won’t allow me to have more than 1 month’s worth of birth control pills, either, which means that it is entirely impossible for me to take it properly in the event that i miss two (not that it’s going to happen, but if for some reason i get sick and can’t take them, or something, it’s nice to have a backup) or go on a lengthy trip. so, it seems they’d rather pay for me to have a baby than to allow me a backup pack. what the hell.

  • Don

    There is an International scientist concensus statement that warns against the negative media about ADHD. The statement tells of scientists who have devoted their whole life to research in this area and believe that this a developmental disorder that benefits from treatment. To deny such treatment is a misconception about the disease.

  • Joy

    I have also been refused coverage from Caremark recently of a drug that I have taken for 7 years. There are no alternatives that I tolerate. This is a life saving drug in my case. I am in end stage disease.

    I am having trouble finding the proper address for filing the appeals. It has been an ongoing process since January. Wherever I send a letter they tell me to do something else. I am getting nowhere.

    Any suggestions. Calls do not go anywhere. Just talk to ineffective people.

    Thanks,
    Joy

  • Pingback: Caremark strikes again… at odd time signatures

  • Joy

    VICTORY!!!
    I have just learned that after my second appeal, Caremark has relented and decided to cover my medication.
    This fight has been ongoing since Jan 1. This time my doctor helped me word the appeal asking for a medical review with a physician reviewer (thanks to you, I knew to ask for a physician in the specialty that pertained to my disease).
    I also added this link: http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-0605030241may03,1,1705921.story?coll=chi-business-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true This decison by the federal appeals court in Washington on May 3rd says that no terminally ill person can be denied medication because that drug has not beeen approved by FDA.
    I am sure that they will continue in the future to try to stop my use of this medication….simply because it is so costly. I am very sick, but if there is strength left, there will be another fight.
    I want you to continue to wage this war for your son. Search to see if there are court rulings that back up your appeal. Most court procedures, especially jury trials, are not kind to insurance companies who refuse coverage to thier clients.
    Keep up the fight!! I give God the glory for answering prayers and giving me the strength to work on these appeals. I am celebrating!!!
    Joy

  • Pingback: Joy wins! at odd time signatures

  • redhead468

    I certainly can appreciate all of the info that is included in these posts; however, I feel obligated to advise you that it is NOT Caremark that approves or denies your claims, nor does Caremark make the ultimate decision on what medications are covered. Caremark is a Prescription Benefits Manager (PBM), not an insurance company. A PBM is a company that is contracted by an insurance company to manage the prescription benefits portion of insurance coverage. Management of prescription coverage means administering the benefits according to the insurance plan that you signed up for through your job, an independent insurance agent, or any other venue that you might obtain coverage (Medicare, Cobra, etc…). Caremark does not set the co-pays, it does not handle enrollment into a plan, and it does not decide who or what is covered or how it will be covered. All of this information is given to Caremark by the insurance company you signed up with (Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cigna, Aetna, etc…). Caremark processes the claims according to this information; Caremark advises members (you) how this information applies to them; Caremark fills and ships mail order prescriptions based on the limits set forth by the plan. Keep this in mind: A lot of the information that you seek is included in your plan benefit package or on Caremark’s website. Furthermore, the insurance company should have a website with a wealth of information. As additional ear candy to gnaw on: It is in the INSURANCE COMPANY’S interest to deny your claims one, two, three times or more. Insurance companies (like most businesses) depend on your ignorance, as the consumer, to give up after hitting a brick wall a few times. An insurance company goes out of its way to keep you frustrated with the hope that a claim will never have to be paid.

  • http://drumsnwhistles.com karoli

    redhead468,

    yada yada. This I’ve heard over and over again and you’ve even got the Supremes to back you up. Caremark is a contract administrator, they don’t make decisions, they just enforce the contract.

    Here’s the problem with the reasoning: Whenever someone needs a prior authorization, the denial is signed by a Caremark physician. Not Blue Cross, not Blue Shield, Caremark.

    BC/BS never sees the claim. Caremark shoots the PA for psychiatric meds to their gastroenterologist who checks it against a laundry list without paying real attention to the claim itself and denies it.

    The signature on the denial clearly comes from Caremark. No other company.

    Don’t sing me the Caremark song about how your insurance provider has the info yada yada, because this is a clear-cut structure of plausible deniability, crafted in such a way that the pockets of the CEOs are lined at the expense of the insureds.

    But hey, thanks for the comment.

Previous post:

Next post: