<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clooneygate: Blogs or Not Blogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/03/16/clooneygate-blogs-or-not-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/03/16/clooneygate-blogs-or-not-blogs/</link>
	<description>...politics, pictures, pugs and all that jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huffpost and AOL: Everything old is new again</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/03/16/clooneygate-blogs-or-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-53960</link>
		<dc:creator>Huffpost and AOL: Everything old is new again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drumsnwhistles.com/2006/03/16/clooneygate-blogs-or-not-blogs/#comment-53960</guid>
		<description>[...] aggregator, which was all the Huffington Post was at that time. As long-term readers will recall, I called her out  in the very beginning for her faked, plagiarized posts, and though I softened my opinion of her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aggregator, which was all the Huffington Post was at that time. As long-term readers will recall, I called her out  in the very beginning for her faked, plagiarized posts, and though I softened my opinion of her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drumsnwhistles</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/03/16/clooneygate-blogs-or-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>drumsnwhistles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drumsnwhistles.com/2006/03/16/clooneygate-blogs-or-not-blogs/#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Hey Donna,

Good to see you again!  At least Arianna owned up to things and is trying to set them straight.  For that she deserves credit.  

Still, I&#039;m mind-boggled over the moral twists and turns it took to justify posting that in the first place.  Just wild.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Donna,</p>
<p>Good to see you again!  At least Arianna owned up to things and is trying to set them straight.  For that she deserves credit.  </p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m mind-boggled over the moral twists and turns it took to justify posting that in the first place.  Just wild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/03/16/clooneygate-blogs-or-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drumsnwhistles.com/2006/03/16/clooneygate-blogs-or-not-blogs/#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Yowsah! I can&#039;t believe I&#039;m the first one to comment on this excellent post from TWO WEEKS ago. (Playing hooky from work on catching up on my friends today.)

You are so right about the role bloggers will play in the next election and the care we will all have to take in what we write -- and how much we decide to believe of what we read.

Personally, I like Arianna for her commentaries on KCRW. But that doesn&#039;t mean I disagree with you about her character, or the ethics of passing that post off as Clooney&#039;s &quot;blog.&quot; 

Clooney, on the other hand, is turning out to be so much more than a pretty face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yowsah! I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m the first one to comment on this excellent post from TWO WEEKS ago. (Playing hooky from work on catching up on my friends today.)</p>
<p>You are so right about the role bloggers will play in the next election and the care we will all have to take in what we write &#8212; and how much we decide to believe of what we read.</p>
<p>Personally, I like Arianna for her commentaries on KCRW. But that doesn&#8217;t mean I disagree with you about her character, or the ethics of passing that post off as Clooney&#8217;s &#8220;blog.&#8221; </p>
<p>Clooney, on the other hand, is turning out to be so much more than a pretty face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

