Go Green, Go to Jail

by Karoli on June 19, 2007 · 6 comments

stephan orsakAt least, that seems to be the case in Minnesota.  A friend sent an email about Stephan Orsak today and his story is also on BoingBoing. The photo to your right is Stephan Orsak with his bicycle. Orsak, a professional violinist, chose to ride his bicycle away from the Minneapolis/St. Paul airport, on his way to visiting his daughter and grandchildren.

After being stopped by airport police for no apparent reason, having a discussion with them about his choice to ride a bike instead of driving, and receiving several sets of conflicting instructions from them, he was thrown to the ground, tasered twice, and had his glasses crushed in the process. Rather than re-telling his story, I’ll point you toward the relevant documents, which I read before I wrote this. They are:

  1. Orsak’s story, in his own words. Be sure to read through the comments for an idea of the diverse perspectives on whether or not the charges were justified. Some will scare you. What should scare you is knowing that such attitudes are not unusual in today’s US of A.
  2. Full Police Report/Narratives of the Incident
  3. Motion to Dismiss/Legal Arguments
  4. Links to photos, maps, route and related stories
  5. MN Bicycle Laws – Note that bicyclists are expected by law to ride on the road, respect traffic laws, and ride as close to the right as possible.
  6. MN Vehicle Laws

Jury selection begins for his trial on July 16th.

Some commenters on Orsak’s blogspot site seem to think that riding a bike is a “hobby”, instead of a legitimate mode of transportation. This follows on a trend I’ve seen more and more of lately — the bike-hating public, who thinks that people on bikes are some kind of perverse sector of society (yes, one commenter even said that Orsak was ‘gay and perverse’ — their words, not mine — for riding his bike) who live to make life difficult for the ‘righteous ones’ in auto-mo-biles.

I rode a bike as my primary mode of transportation all the way through high school and college. I didn’t get a drivers’ license until I was 18, and only then because not having it would have inconvenienced my mother. I rode to school, to work, to parks and to the beach, 20 miles or more away. I rode on the same streets that you drive on, fully cognizant that I had a duty to abide by the rules of the road, yield to other vehicles and signal my intentions just as they did. This was before bike lanes were the norm and somehow we all managed to get along.

Somewhere through the years, it became a “hobby”? When, exactly, was that? I gave it up when I was nearly run down by a guy in a big truck and I had The Eldest in a child seat on it. Inhabiting the same road as the big boys carried too much risk for me to put my child on a bike and ride on the same streets which had felt so safe to me as a child.

In these days of $3+/gallon gas, why are we making targets out of bicyclists? And when did we start living in a country where someone riding a bike, posing no threat to the officers (by their own account there was no gesture worthy of a taser hit, much less the rest of it), breaking NO LAW, can be treated in such a shameful fashion?

This is another ‘get the word out’ kind of thing. Orsak shouldn’t be charged with anything, much less six counts of trumped-up self-justificatory pseudocrap intended to cover up unfair, unlawful and unjust acts on the part of the airport police.

Ordinarily, this is where I’d qualify my post by saying I’m sure most police officers are wonderful, law-abiding citizens. I’m not sure I think that anymore. It seems that the paranoia and apathy of recent years, combined with paranoid leadership are encouraging the good guys to become the bad guys.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

  • banya

    Alright, I will make no apologies for any harm that was inflicted upon mr. Orsak exagerrated or truthfully illustrated. What I will note is the stupidity of his being where he was on a bike. There is no suitable way to leave the airport via a road that does not cross ina and out of restricted area. The Glumack Rd I know is a highway and 30 MPH quickly becomes 55 MPH upon leaving the airport. A nice alternative for someone who has “done (his) homework” would have been taking the LRT (Light Rail public transit) for FREE to the HHH terminal and been on his merry way. In fact, for 1.50 he could have gone 1 or 2 stops towards MPLS and been that much closer to his destination in St Paul.
    I really think many blogs have misinterpreted this as lash-out against bikers, to which I laugh heartily; this man was trying to bike on a @*#@! freeway! The police were doing there jobs (up until the point of he said/she said at least).

  • Banya
  • http://greencycles.blogspot.com Stephan Orsak

    Thank you, Karoli, for your blog entry and helping spread the word.

    Emily Gurnon of the St Paul Pioneer Press just published an excellent, balanced story on this incident- http://www.twincities.com/ci_6220737?nclick_check=1

    I posted the following to the Star Tribune road guy blog. Perhaps this will clear up some questions about the route I planned to take:

    1 June 07

    Greetings to all, I’m Stephan Orsak, the violinist/cyclist who was attacked by Airport police. I’m happy to answer any questions, and really appreciate all of your responses to this. I also urge you to visit my blog greencycles.blogspot.com, post a comment there, download or forward a poster and let others know about this. Full case details are on my website http://web.mac.com/stephanorsak

    I’ve found many thoughtful comments here and on other forums. It helps me to know what questions people have. As for leaving MSP airport by bike, this used to be absolutely legal. It is true that BY CAR there is only one way to leave- one must use the highway. But by bike, one takes Outbound Road toward the highway (15mph to 30mph max, same as residential MPLS), then begin to take the ‘return to terminal’ ramp, but immediately get off the road and cross over the median to Northwest Dr, the parallel service road, ‘walk’ a few hundred feet as it is one-way, then ride the rest as it becomes two way traffic. It is very lightly travelled. From there, Post Road, crossing over the highway and to the Fort Snelling trails. Very nice once you’re there. HOWEVER, 4 months after my incident, police put up (4) new signs, strangely placed, prohibiting bikes. For the full scoop on this, see my website http://web.mac.com/stephanorsak/iWeb/Site/New%20signs.html

    Also want to say that many other airports make it EASY to come and go by bicycle, and for airport workers to do the same. (Many concession workers are very low paid and the 2x daily transit fare is a lot.) For example, at the Friedrichsafen airport in Germany you exit the front doors, cross the street, and there is the bike trail, with benches, signs with mileage markers, a covered gazebo and large maps of the area. Easy. In Basel the bike trail goes right to the front doors of the airport, and you can even pluck raspberries for breakfast along the way (!).

    I think skepticism can be a healthy thing. I would not expect anyone who doesn’t know me to believe this, just because I have told it. Instead, please have a look at the police evidence, and read their narratives, and judge for yourselves if what they are saying makes any sense at all. Both scans and pure text versions of what the police have written are on my website. Also check out the slideshows on the signs. You’ll be amazed.

    Thanks again to all, cheers and peaceful wishes, Stephan

  • http://www.gotshoo.com/wordpress/ shoo

    I just got back from a vacation in Colorado where biking is really considered a form of transportation (Boulder, especially). I felt comfortable biking the streets of Boulder even when I should have been wearing a helmet. Drivers give you the right of way, they don’t pass you in the turn lane, they don’t play chicken.

    Ahh, that was a sweet ride. Now back in Illinois I hug that bike path as if both tires would go flat if they touched the road.

  • anonymous

    I just became aware of Mr. Orsak's puzzling bicycling-police-brutality incident. Although Mr. Orsak appears to have invested a lot of energy if this incident, I can't find any accounting of what happened? Did he have a trial? What was the outcome? It seems weird that it just seems to have let it drop.

    I concede that one reason I am frustrated that I can't find out what happened is because Mr. Orsak appears to have disabled his greencycles blog, preventing me from commenting.

    I am a bike rider. I live in N. California. In CA, bikes are legal on all public roads, although highways are different because of safety considerations. Bike riders are required to follow all the same rules as car drivers but bike riders don't. I include myself in this statement, that not all bike riders obey all traffic laws. I am guilty of flying through intersections without coming to a full stop, guilty of riding through red lights when I don't see any cars. I put myself as risk with these choices and I aspire to become a better bike rider, to obey the laws.

    Bicyclists are at danger and not necessarily because some drivers are hostile towards bikes. Some drivers are hostile towards bikes but not all that many, if you ask me. The real danger drivers present to bicycle riders is the car drivers are human, imperfect AND it is hard to always see the bike rider. A responsible bike rider has to take some self responsibility, to really acknowledge for themselves that biking is sometimes dangerous. . . and not because anyone is doing anything wrong. Biking is dangerous because cars weigh a lot and can kill the unprotected bicyclist.

    I am confident that the cops who stopped Mr. Orsak saw a potential danger for the bicyclist. I do not believe, not for a minute, that the cops who stopped Mr. Orsak (I knew him when he went by his birth name of Randy) literally saw a man in danger: a freeway, with cars driving very fast, no bike lanes, no shoulder.

    I also know Stephan/Randy Orsak. He is, as many commented on his greencycles blog, an arrogant man. Yes, he is an artist and we can give him a little credit for having an artistic, dreamy temperament. But he is intellectually arrogant and not a little bit crazy.

    I am sure this is what happened by the airport when he got stopped on his bike: the cops stopped him and asked him not to ride his bike there. I don't think the cops were being pigs, although I have plenty experience with cops being pigs and I know that cops are often dehumanized and become really awful in how they treat people. We ask a lot of police officers and we don't offer them enough support to overcome the corrosive effects of having to deal with the negative aspects of life that require police intercession. We don't give cops enough support to repair the damage of dealing with human problems, although this does not ever justify cops turning into pigs. It is a complex problem.

    But I'd be willing to bet a lot that the cop who stopped Randy (Stephan) did so innocently, seeking to protect what they perceived to be a person riding in threatening circumstances.

    Stephan/Randy should have just done as they asked, get off the road.

    Everything he did after he refused to stop riding his bike put him in the wrong.

    Just because he is an educated, erudite professional musician does not meant it is okay for Mr. Orsak to disobey the police. We are all legally required to follow a police officer's directions. If a cop asks us to stop, we are legally required to do so.

    When he refused to obey the instruction to take better care of himself (which is, when you think about it, what the cops were doing), he must have triggered a trained response in the police. From the police perspective, Orsak resisted their lawful request.

    It sounds unfortunate that the police chose to physically contact Mr. Orsak but what else were they supposed to do? He had repeatedly refused their reasonable order to stop riding . . . so he forced them to forcefully stop him.

    That's what happened.

    And take it from me: when cops ask you to not move, you are supposed to obey. Later on, you can work out questions of fact, such as was Orsak riding legally or not?

    Orsak brought this on himself. The fact that Orsak chose to make it an obsession that apparently overtook other aspects of his life (some posts suggest he spent so much time on this ridiculous tempest in a teapot that he lost income opportunities. . . but no one mentions that Orsak never in his whole life has ever earned much money because he is dysfunctional,crazy and not really capable of working.

    Only a loon would allow such a minor incident to become an obsession.

    I hate a lot about police in this society. I have no doubt that the police did not act softly and patiently with Mr. Orsak when he exhibited what appeared to the cops, reasonably, I am certain, as puzzling behavior. . . . think of it from their perspective. They stopped a guy who was riding in dangerous conditions and he refused to stop riding. The cops on the side of that freeway were not in a position to debate bicycle laws or bicycle safety on that road. They were trying to protect Mr. Orsak from his own poor judgement. Nuts like Orsak give biking a bad name.

  • anonymous

    I just became aware of Mr. Orsak's puzzling bicycling-police-brutality incident. Although Mr. Orsak appears to have invested a lot of energy if this incident, I can't find any accounting of what happened? Did he have a trial? What was the outcome? It seems weird that it just seems to have let it drop.

    I concede that one reason I am frustrated that I can't find out what happened is because Mr. Orsak appears to have disabled his greencycles blog, preventing me from commenting.

    I am a bike rider. I live in N. California. In CA, bikes are legal on all public roads, although highways are different because of safety considerations. Bike riders are required to follow all the same rules as car drivers but bike riders don't. I include myself in this statement, that not all bike riders obey all traffic laws. I am guilty of flying through intersections without coming to a full stop, guilty of riding through red lights when I don't see any cars. I put myself as risk with these choices and I aspire to become a better bike rider, to obey the laws.

    Bicyclists are at danger and not necessarily because some drivers are hostile towards bikes. Some drivers are hostile towards bikes but not all that many, if you ask me. The real danger drivers present to bicycle riders is the car drivers are human, imperfect AND it is hard to always see the bike rider. A responsible bike rider has to take some self responsibility, to really acknowledge for themselves that biking is sometimes dangerous. . . and not because anyone is doing anything wrong. Biking is dangerous because cars weigh a lot and can kill the unprotected bicyclist.

    I am confident that the cops who stopped Mr. Orsak saw a potential danger for the bicyclist. I do not believe, not for a minute, that the cops who stopped Mr. Orsak (I knew him when he went by his birth name of Randy) literally saw a man in danger: a freeway, with cars driving very fast, no bike lanes, no shoulder.

    I also know Stephan/Randy Orsak. He is, as many commented on his greencycles blog, an arrogant man. Yes, he is an artist and we can give him a little credit for having an artistic, dreamy temperament. But he is intellectually arrogant and not a little bit crazy.

    I am sure this is what happened by the airport when he got stopped on his bike: the cops stopped him and asked him not to ride his bike there. I don't think the cops were being pigs, although I have plenty experience with cops being pigs and I know that cops are often dehumanized and become really awful in how they treat people. We ask a lot of police officers and we don't offer them enough support to overcome the corrosive effects of having to deal with the negative aspects of life that require police intercession. We don't give cops enough support to repair the damage of dealing with human problems, although this does not ever justify cops turning into pigs. It is a complex problem.

    But I'd be willing to bet a lot that the cop who stopped Randy (Stephan) did so innocently, seeking to protect what they perceived to be a person riding in threatening circumstances.

    Stephan/Randy should have just done as they asked, get off the road.

    Everything he did after he refused to stop riding his bike put him in the wrong.

    Just because he is an educated, erudite professional musician does not meant it is okay for Mr. Orsak to disobey the police. We are all legally required to follow a police officer's directions. If a cop asks us to stop, we are legally required to do so.

    When he refused to obey the instruction to take better care of himself (which is, when you think about it, what the cops were doing), he must have triggered a trained response in the police. From the police perspective, Orsak resisted their lawful request.

    It sounds unfortunate that the police chose to physically contact Mr. Orsak but what else were they supposed to do? He had repeatedly refused their reasonable order to stop riding . . . so he forced them to forcefully stop him.

    That's what happened.

    And take it from me: when cops ask you to not move, you are supposed to obey. Later on, you can work out questions of fact, such as was Orsak riding legally or not?

    Orsak brought this on himself. The fact that Orsak chose to make it an obsession that apparently overtook other aspects of his life (some posts suggest he spent so much time on this ridiculous tempest in a teapot that he lost income opportunities. . . but no one mentions that Orsak never in his whole life has ever earned much money because he is dysfunctional,crazy and not really capable of working.

    Only a loon would allow such a minor incident to become an obsession.

    I hate a lot about police in this society. I have no doubt that the police did not act softly and patiently with Mr. Orsak when he exhibited what appeared to the cops, reasonably, I am certain, as puzzling behavior. . . . think of it from their perspective. They stopped a guy who was riding in dangerous conditions and he refused to stop riding. The cops on the side of that freeway were not in a position to debate bicycle laws or bicycle safety on that road. They were trying to protect Mr. Orsak from his own poor judgement. Nuts like Orsak give biking a bad name.

Previous post:

Next post: