Are PR Firms Buying the A-List?

by Karoli on October 20, 2007 · 26 comments

Todd Cochrane has an interesting post up over at Geek News Central today about a new SEO gaming techique which is evidently the new playground of tech bloggers.  Based on his description, it seems that the game is played this way:

  1. Advance PR releases go to mainstream bloggers.
  2. These same bloggers write reviews of new site or feature and begin building buzz
  3. These same bloggers are paid to place specific links into their posts
  4. The A-List post hits Techmeme, others link to it, and the result is a lot of strong Google Juice for the site or service looking for the links.

Frankly, this post surprised me.  A lot.  I’m thinking now about the A-List tech bloggers that I read regularly and how adamant they all were that they would nevernevernevernever place paid links in their posts, that doing such a thing, particularly without disclosure, was something only whores would do, and in particular, whores that write for PayPerPost.

I wrote for PayPerPost.  I don’t any more but it has absolutely nothing to do with PayPerPost.  I have other restrictions that keep me from writing for them but frankly, if I could I still would, particularly with some of the great stuff they have going on right now (particularly in the entertainment and tech areas).  From day one I always voluntarily disclosed my paid links and the way PPP is structured now, disclosure is a requirement, not an option.

Here’s what Todd says about it:

But I do know it includes mainstream “A” list bloggers in their “specific” categories who are paid to link to specific sites. While this is not new per se, some of the other things he hinted at (such as how the linking was done), were unique, in at least that I have not heard of the practice before.*

So what gives?  Is Techcrunch being paid for links?  MashableRead/Write/Web?  Without disclosure?  Seriously, I can’t imagine that it’s as straightforward as it’s outlined above.  At the same time, there’s no question in my mind that Techmeme is reshaping the way tech bloggers choose topics and write about them.  If you’re a tech blogger looking for a name and recognition, the path to that end is to watch Techmeme and write about whatever is at the top.  Of course, it helps to write something intelligent, but I’ve certainly seen more than a few blog posts that are basically nothing more than a quote and  a link back to the A-lister at the top. 

The more subtle way to pay bloggers for links would be to release the advance PR with a promise for an ad buy on the blogger’s site after the posts (and the site, features, release, whatever) goes live.  I wouldn’t be surprised nor bothered by that.  But I will be seriously annoyed to have taken all of the flack that flew around last year about writing for PayPerPost (not to mention the rotten treatment of Ted Murphy and a lot of the bloggers that I really like and read regularly, like Colleen over at Geeky Speaky)  only to discover that all of the righteousness over it was nothing more than hypocritical turf defense.

Todd’s solution to the Google gaming is to stop using Techmeme and go back to reading a lot of different blogs.  I think there’s value in both.  Blogher editors, for example, write about hot topics across a gamut of areas, from mommy blogs to food blogs, to non-profit blogs to political blogs to life-in-general blogs.  They have a policy of linking out to many of their affiliated bloggers, no matter what their page rank or visibility factor.  That makes Blogher one of my first stops when I read feeds.  I have 300 or so individual RSS feeds that I read every day on a gamut of topics — from education to health to politics to tech.  There are some A-Listers on there and many others who aren’t, but whose opinion I respect.  I think mixing both is a way to come up with a pretty whole picture of whatever is happening with bloggers.

More fundamentally, though, what happened to all of the righteous posturing about paid linking and disclosure?  Isn’t a paid link a paid link, no matter how it’s placed?

Update: Mashable’s Pete Cashmore responds with an emphatic “No!” and goes a bit further, saying “accepting cash for posts without disclosure would destroy your reputation and therefore your revenues. There is nobody who would take the bait.” I’m glad to hear it, since Mashable is my first stop for news on new web stuff since I unsubscribed from Techcrunch a year or so ago.

*From the time I first published this post, Todd made some edits that caused my original quote to be inconsistent — I’ve re-quoted the current post word-for-word

Blogged with Flock

Tags: , , , , ,

{ 20 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Wade Rockett October 22, 2007 at 9:18 am

Actually, Cochrane doesn’t really say #3 (in much the same way that President Bush did not really say that Saddam Hussein was behind The September 11 attacks.)

He discusses two different practices in one post, leading the csual reader to believe that “A-list” tech bloggers accept money for links.

2 seotest December 9, 2008 at 5:33 am

yes in quite times, because PR is so much good for a site

3 electronic cigarette location August 5, 2014 at 8:22 am

960664 686411Identified this on MSN and I

4 use this link August 19, 2014 at 8:35 am

I just want to tell you that I’m very new to blogs and actually savored your web blog. Probably I’m want to bookmark your site . You definitely come with superb articles. Cheers for revealing your website.

5 great info August 20, 2014 at 7:37 pm

The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

6 Drew Weniger August 20, 2014 at 11:54 pm

Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is fantastic, let alone the content!

7 Tyrell Graybill August 20, 2014 at 11:54 pm

of course like your web site however you have to check the spelling on several of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling problems and I in finding it very troublesome to inform the truth then again I’ll certainly come again again.

8 see here now August 21, 2014 at 4:06 am

May I just say what a relief to discover a person that actually knows what they’re discussing on the internet. You definitely realize how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people have to look at this and understand this side of the story. I can’t believe you aren’t more popular because you certainly have the gift.

9 good article August 21, 2014 at 4:52 am

Aw, this was a very good post. Finding the time and actual effort to produce a great article… but what can I say… I hesitate a whole lot and don’t manage to get nearly anything done.

10 Delisa Rawdon August 21, 2014 at 5:40 am

It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this superb blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will share this website with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

11 Carma Lenahan August 21, 2014 at 7:19 am

Next time I read a blog, I hope that it won’t fail me as much as this one. I mean, Yes, it was my choice to read, nonetheless I genuinely thought you’d have something helpful to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could possibly fix if you were not too busy looking for attention.

12 Homer Magner August 21, 2014 at 7:58 am

You have made some good points there. I checked on the internet for more information about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this website.

13 check article August 21, 2014 at 1:38 pm

After I originally left a comment I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I recieve four emails with the exact same comment. Is there an easy method you can remove me from that service? Thanks a lot!

14 great info August 21, 2014 at 2:40 pm

Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

15 Myron Ambert August 21, 2014 at 7:10 pm

Great blog here! Also your website loads up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

16 Clair Sebranek August 21, 2014 at 8:37 pm

This blog was… how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I’ve found something that helped me. Thanks!

17 Brittaney Bandura August 21, 2014 at 9:44 pm

I’m really impressed together with your writing talents as smartly as with the format to your blog. Is that this a paid subject or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it is uncommon to see a great blog like this one today..

18 Lowell Lynam August 21, 2014 at 9:54 pm

It’s really great to interact with Sims fans all over the world and in my opinion has widened the scope of the game tremendously. The system comes with six content-rich modules with the following subjects. In this article you will find the solutions that are working well to fix the freezing problem with the game.

19 Lowell Fralic August 21, 2014 at 10:49 pm

Oh my goodness! Amazing article dude! Thank you so much, However I am having troubles with your RSS. I don’t know the reason why I am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody having the same RSS problems? Anybody who knows the solution can you kindly respond? Thanx!!

20 Manual Ogrodowicz August 21, 2014 at 11:39 pm

Would you be all in favour of exchanging hyperlinks?

Leave a Comment

{ 6 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: