Print Print

MySpace Madness: Do You Know What’s Three Links Away?

by Karoli on January 29, 2008

If you’re a teacher or a cop, you’d better. From Wired News:

Gulf Middle School resource officer John Nohejl didn’t have porn on his MySpace profile, and he didn’t link to porn. But one of the 170-odd people on his friends list, which seems mostly populated by students at his school, had a link to a legal adult site. Now the New Port Richey Police Department and the Florida attorney general’s elite cyber crimes unit are investigating him for making adult content available to underage children.

My first thought when I read this paragraph was that there was another Julie Amero case in the making. Here are the facts:

  1. Officer Nohejl set up a MySpace account and had nearly 200 people on his friends list, mostly students at his school. I’m assuming that his purpose in doing so was to make himself accessible to these students and offer a resource for cyberbullying and the like.
  2. Unbeknownst to Officer Nohejl, one of the people on his friends list had a link to an adult site. I’m guessing it might have been Adult Friend Finder, since they are the most egregious spam offenders, but it could have been a kid who registered as an adult and had added ‘friends’ who were really just porn links. Whatever the case, it was NOT on the officer’s friends list, wasn’t even on his radar.

    From the St. Petersburg Times:

    The offensive links were discovered after an anonymous caller phoned the Times to complain, saying her son and his friends accessed the “Amateur Match Free Sex” site via the officer’s page on Monday.

  3. Officer Nohejl is now under investigation by the Florida attorney general’s cyber crimes unit and the New Port Richey Police Department.

Now personally, I’m more concerned about the New Port Richey Police Department, because I’m guessing they referred it up to the AG’s office instead of looking carefully at the circumstances which might have given rise to the discovery of porn links on the officer’s friends’ page. If they have an investigation like Julie Amero’s, Officer Nohejl might find himself facing trumped-up charges of child endangerment or some other absurdity.

A couple of red flags went off immediately for me. The first was the “anonymous caller” to the Times. If you are a parent and you discovered a trail of links on MySpace that linked from the officer’s page to a friend’s page to a porn site, would you call the newspaper without first notifying the officer? Keep in mind, these were NOT direct links. It stinks to high heaven to me – smells like either a setup by a student or another hysterical parent, a la Nate Fisher, who, when confronted with their middle schooler’s exposure to the nasty content, looked for the first person they could to blame.

Here’s another red flag, courtesy of the Florida Attorney General’s office:

Cybersafety “is the attorney general’s highest priority,” said Sandy Copes, the attorney general’s spokeswoman. “I am sure the attorney general would be extremely concerned if a member of the trusted law enforcement community was either inadvertently or directly placing students at risk to being exposed to inappropriate content.”

What the bold text says to me is this: You’d better check every single link from your MySpace or Facebook pages and from your Friends’ MySpace page and you’d better do it on a daily basis. Maybe even hourly. Consider this: Someone has a grudge and intentionally adds a link to an adult site to their MySpace page, calls the paper, gets law enforcement involved, etc. But just an hour before, that person’s page was free of offending links. How often should someone like Officer Nohejl check outbound links on friends’ pages? Most importantly, how is he responsible for what someone else places on their page?

The school principal and police department had full and complete knowledge of the officer’s MySpace profile. They knew he was using it from his home because of district filters, and they knew why he had it. To expect him to monitor links from his friends’ pages to other pages is utterly absurd.

Here’s the final irony: When Wired News was checking out this story they discovered links from the official school web site to a gay porn site. How did that get there, you ask? The original, legitimate web site’s domain had expired, a domain scraper bought the name and placed adult content links on the site. Happens every day. But do take note: No one sent this one up to the AG’s office for investigation, downplaying it as a “troublesome, but not so sinister” occurrence.

I urge the police department and attorney general’s office in Florida to issue an explanation and drop all criminal investigation of this school resource officer who has had nothing but glowing reports and reviews.

For the rest of us — do you know what’s three links away from your site? Maybe you should.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

  • MALLORY
    ps: Public defenders in Highlands county, yuo better hope you never need one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • MALLORY
    i really don't like florida
  • MALLORY
    THE STATE OF FLORIDA IS ON A "HUNT". UNFORTUNATELY THEY ARE NOT FINDING THE "PRODUCERS" OF THIS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. THE TASK FORCE THAT HAS EVOLVED, HAS MORE THAN TRIPLED IN THE PAST YEAR.

    THAT SENDS UP A "BIG RED FLAG"!!! IF IN FACT THERE WAS AN ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF ANYTHING, IF THE INDIVIDUAL WHOM RECEIVED
    THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION, SENDS BACK THE TRANSMISSION, WITH A REBUTTLE OF, "NO THANKS, I'M NOT INTO THAT!" THE ELECTRONIC TRNSMISSION, HAS BEEN SENT!! WHAT IF THE TRANSMISSION DESCRIBED
    ABOVE, WAS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT TRYING TO "ENTRAP" SOMEONE??

    ARE THEY STILL BEING PROSECUTED FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIALS?? THE ANSWER IS, YES THEY ARE!!
    EVEN THOUGH THE INDIVIDUAL SENT A RESPONSE OF, "NO THANKS"

    THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS ONE OF THE LARGEST TASK FORCES TO DO WITH CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. I AM NOT SAYING IT IS A BAD THING. WHAT I'M SAYING IS THE MEANS OF THERE TACTICS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!
    IF THE TASK FORCE DOES NOT PRODUCE...THEY LOSE THE $$ FUNDING TO CONTINUE ON... THE SPECTRUM FOR THESE TASK FORCES ARE TOO BROAD. THEIR TACTICS ARE UNJUST AND SCAPEGOATING IS A BIG PART OF THE PROGRAM..... IF YOU ARE SERVED WITH A SEARCH WARRENT FOR YOUR COMPUTER, ANYTHING ELSE, OUT OF CLEAR VIEW(OUT IN THE OPEN)
    IS NOT PART OF THE SEARCH WARRENT
  • Karoli,

    Great observations as usual. This needs to remain on everyone's radar because the ability of anonymous callers to harm innocent people by accusing them of wholly fabricated sex crimes is becoming epidemic. And to top it off the justice system is complicit in the damage done to the innocent out of audacious stupidity.
  • I feel like we are reliving Nate Fisher! This is an incredible story and I agree, why is it dying down.. this story should serve as catalyst to encourage discussion about this very issue -- too many people can easily have a knee-jerk reaction to something and then upend someone else's career. Once again, the parents are looking for external excuses. I would like to learn more about this... perhaps after Tuesday. Thanks for educating me .... as you always do.
  • sheesh. Florida is looking dumber and dumber -- the creationist garbage in the schools, and now this.

    my post here.
  • I've heard that the furor is dying down over this, but to me, being investigated by the AG and local police because of an anonymous 'tip' is the dangerous part of this story. The AG's office of cybercrimes has some smart folks in it who will surely understand the situation, but based upon what we saw in Julie Amero's case, I don't think we can have the same confidence in the local police anywhere.

    What possessed this parent to go to the newspaper instead of simply confronting this officer and the principal about what had happened? What was their goal? Were they hoping to embarrass the school? the officer?

    The real villain in this particular piece (just as in the Nate Fisher and Julie Amero case) is the hysterical parent who is too ignorant to understand how MySpace works and immediately assumed the officer had done something wrong.
  • Why is the furor dying down? Do people not care? Is the investigation going to continue?
  • Gideon,

    From what I've been told by folks in Florida, the AG's cybercrime division have some pretty savvy folks who understand this stuff. Although there's no official word that I've found at least, the officer has not been relieved from duty or sanctioned in any way.

    With that said, the idea that some anonymous hysterical nutcase could upend someone's entire career is unthinkable to me, and really, it's time to educate folks on the realities of social networks and the Internet.

    Oh, and did I mention that mom was pissed b/c her son and his friends were clicking into the naughty pictures, so instead of dealing with them, she tries to pin the whole thing on the good officer, who she somehow expected to check his linked links hourly or something.

    What a putz
  • I have a guy on my facebook that makes the baby jesus cry everyday. If distant memory serves me correctly, I only have puppets and hip hop artists on my MySpace, so I'm probably safe. The Florida case is ridiculous, but I am at least glad that it didn't get ignored by the lower level people who had to respond to it.
  • p.s. as I discovered to my chagrin last week, the results of links vary depending on where you are located. Thus, the perfectly benign image search for 'Downes' that I have used many times here in Canada cannot be trusted in Malaysia, where it revealed a naked body on the first page. So I would have to spend a lifetime in each political jurisdiction in the world, which is currently roighly 200 lifetimes.
  • I have tens of thousands of links on my site. It would literally take the rest of my life to see what's available three links away.

    Moreover, social network theory tells us that the entire internet is no more than six links away. So I can be very sure that a person could fairly easily click from my site to a porn site.

    The only way to prevent this is to create enclaves inside the internet that are not connected to the rest of the internet. Leaving aside the difficulty of such a project, the damage it would do to the internet as a whole would leave it beyond repair.

    It's better to teach people what to do and who to react when they are accidentally exposed to offensive materials, than to tr to change the fabric of space and time in order to isolate them from it.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: