THAT SENDS UP A “BIG RED FLAG”!!! IF IN FACT THERE WAS AN ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF ANYTHING, IF THE INDIVIDUAL WHOM RECEIVED
THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION, SENDS BACK THE TRANSMISSION, WITH A REBUTTLE OF, “NO THANKS, I'M NOT INTO THAT!” THE ELECTRONIC TRNSMISSION, HAS BEEN SENT!! WHAT IF THE TRANSMISSION DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WAS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT TRYING TO “ENTRAP” SOMEONE??

ARE THEY STILL BEING PROSECUTED FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIALS?? THE ANSWER IS, YES THEY ARE!!
EVEN THOUGH THE INDIVIDUAL SENT A RESPONSE OF, “NO THANKS”

THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS ONE OF THE LARGEST TASK FORCES TO DO WITH CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. I AM NOT SAYING IT IS A BAD THING. WHAT I'M SAYING IS THE MEANS OF THERE TACTICS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!
IF THE TASK FORCE DOES NOT PRODUCE…THEY LOSE THE $$ FUNDING TO CONTINUE ON… THE SPECTRUM FOR THESE TASK FORCES ARE TOO BROAD. THEIR TACTICS ARE UNJUST AND SCAPEGOATING IS A BIG PART OF THE PROGRAM….. IF YOU ARE SERVED WITH A SEARCH WARRENT FOR YOUR COMPUTER, ANYTHING ELSE, OUT OF CLEAR VIEW(OUT IN THE OPEN)
IS NOT PART OF THE SEARCH WARRENT

THAT SENDS UP A “BIG RED FLAG”!!! IF IN FACT THERE WAS AN ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF ANYTHING, IF THE INDIVIDUAL WHOM RECEIVED
THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION, SENDS BACK THE TRANSMISSION, WITH A REBUTTLE OF, “NO THANKS, I'M NOT INTO THAT!” THE ELECTRONIC TRNSMISSION, HAS BEEN SENT!! WHAT IF THE TRANSMISSION DESCRIBED
ABOVE, WAS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT TRYING TO “ENTRAP” SOMEONE??

ARE THEY STILL BEING PROSECUTED FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIALS?? THE ANSWER IS, YES THEY ARE!!
EVEN THOUGH THE INDIVIDUAL SENT A RESPONSE OF, “NO THANKS”

THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS ONE OF THE LARGEST TASK FORCES TO DO WITH CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. I AM NOT SAYING IT IS A BAD THING. WHAT I'M SAYING IS THE MEANS OF THERE TACTICS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!
IF THE TASK FORCE DOES NOT PRODUCE…THEY LOSE THE $$ FUNDING TO CONTINUE ON… THE SPECTRUM FOR THESE TASK FORCES ARE TOO BROAD. THEIR TACTICS ARE UNJUST AND SCAPEGOATING IS A BIG PART OF THE PROGRAM….. IF YOU ARE SERVED WITH A SEARCH WARRENT FOR YOUR COMPUTER, ANYTHING ELSE, OUT OF CLEAR VIEW(OUT IN THE OPEN)
IS NOT PART OF THE SEARCH WARRENT

Great observations as usual. This needs to remain on everyone's radar because the ability of anonymous callers to harm innocent people by accusing them of wholly fabricated sex crimes is becoming epidemic. And to top it off the justice system is complicit in the damage done to the innocent out of audacious stupidity.

From what I've been told by folks in Florida, the AG's cybercrime division have some pretty savvy folks who understand this stuff. Although there's no official word that I've found at least, the officer has not been relieved from duty or sanctioned in any way.

With that said, the idea that some anonymous hysterical nutcase could upend someone's entire career is unthinkable to me, and really, it's time to educate folks on the realities of social networks and the Internet.

Oh, and did I mention that mom was pissed b/c her son and his friends were clicking into the naughty pictures, so instead of dealing with them, she tries to pin the whole thing on the good officer, who she somehow expected to check his linked links hourly or something.

What a putz