<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Fiola and the Ticking Time Bomb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/06/17/michael-fiola-and-the-ticking-time-bomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/06/17/michael-fiola-and-the-ticking-time-bomb/</link>
	<description>...politics, pictures, pugs and all that jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: odd time signatures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Julie Amero: One Year Later, Still No Liberty. Or Justice.</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/06/17/michael-fiola-and-the-ticking-time-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-41178</link>
		<dc:creator>odd time signatures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Julie Amero: One Year Later, Still No Liberty. Or Justice.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/06/17/michael-fiola-and-the-ticking-time-bomb/#comment-41178</guid>
		<description>[...] verdict was set aside. There is no doubt whatsoever that Julie Amero is as innocent as Michael Fiola was. There is no doubt that the viruses, trojans and malware that were on the computer in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] verdict was set aside. There is no doubt whatsoever that Julie Amero is as innocent as Michael Fiola was. There is no doubt that the viruses, trojans and malware that were on the computer in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcadow</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/06/17/michael-fiola-and-the-ticking-time-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-51675</link>
		<dc:creator>jcadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/06/17/michael-fiola-and-the-ticking-time-bomb/#comment-51675</guid>
		<description>Hey, Peops - how about sending an e-mail message to the MA DIA in support of Mr. Fiola?  Here&#039;s one I sent - feel free to plagiarize:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To:  	&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:info2@dia.state.ma.us&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;info2@dia.state.ma.us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;To Whom It May Concern:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you should reconsider your stance on Mr. Fiola&#039;s dismissal due to material discovered on his laptop.  As I&#039;m sure you are aware, an article in Monday&#039;s Boston Herald (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view/2008_06_16_Ex-official_readies_suit_over_bogus_child_porn_rap/srvc=home&amp;position=7&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/gener...&lt;/a&gt;) and a widely circulated article by PC Magazine (&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/guy_gets_fired_and_ruined_for.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/gu...&lt;/a&gt;) states that Tami Loehrs proved Fiola&#039;s innocence. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It appears that your IT department may in fact be to blame for his laptop&#039;s virus infection - using a poor antivirus program, not configuring it properly, or perhaps using only a single antivirus solution.  Or maybe they did all that could be reasonably expected of them.  But clearly Fiola is innocent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be a shame if you do not reconsider your decision to dismiss Michael Fiola.  Sticking by a rash, ill-informed decision, rather than showing humility and admitting fault, will tarnish your department and breed ill-will with the public, especially since the story has now been brought to light.  It has had such an affect on me at least.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; YOUR NAME HERE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Peops &#8211; how about sending an e-mail message to the MA DIA in support of Mr. Fiola?  Here&#39;s one I sent &#8211; feel free to plagiarize:</p>
<p>To:  	<a href="mailto:info2@dia.state.ma.us" rel="nofollow">info2@dia.state.ma.us</a><br />To Whom It May Concern:</p>
<p>I think you should reconsider your stance on Mr. Fiola&#39;s dismissal due to material discovered on his laptop.  As I&#39;m sure you are aware, an article in Monday&#39;s Boston Herald (<a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view/2008_06_16_Ex-official_readies_suit_over_bogus_child_porn_rap/srvc=home&#038;position=7" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/gener.." rel="nofollow">http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/gener..</a>.) and a widely circulated article by PC Magazine (<a href="http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/guy_gets_fired_and_ruined_for.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/gu.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/gu..</a>.) states that Tami Loehrs proved Fiola&#39;s innocence. </p>
<p>It appears that your IT department may in fact be to blame for his laptop&#39;s virus infection &#8211; using a poor antivirus program, not configuring it properly, or perhaps using only a single antivirus solution.  Or maybe they did all that could be reasonably expected of them.  But clearly Fiola is innocent.</p>
<p>It would be a shame if you do not reconsider your decision to dismiss Michael Fiola.  Sticking by a rash, ill-informed decision, rather than showing humility and admitting fault, will tarnish your department and breed ill-will with the public, especially since the story has now been brought to light.  It has had such an affect on me at least.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p> YOUR NAME HERE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcadow</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/06/17/michael-fiola-and-the-ticking-time-bomb/comment-page-1/#comment-41615</link>
		<dc:creator>jcadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/06/17/michael-fiola-and-the-ticking-time-bomb/#comment-41615</guid>
		<description>Hey, Peops - how about sending an e-mail message to the MA DIA in support of Mr. Fiola?  Here&#039;s one I sent - feel free to plagiarize:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To:  	&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:info2@dia.state.ma.us&quot;&gt;info2@dia.state.ma.us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;To Whom It May Concern:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you should reconsider your stance on Mr. Fiola&#039;s dismissal due to material discovered on his laptop.  As I&#039;m sure you are aware, an article in Monday&#039;s Boston Herald (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view/2008_06_16_Ex-official_readies_suit_over_bogus_child_porn_rap/srvc=home&amp;position=7&quot;&gt;http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/gener...&lt;/a&gt;) and a widely circulated article by PC Magazine (&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/guy_gets_fired_and_ruined_for.php&quot;&gt;http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/gu...&lt;/a&gt;) states that Tami Loehrs proved Fiola&#039;s innocence. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It appears that your IT department may in fact be to blame for his laptop&#039;s virus infection - using a poor antivirus program, not configuring it properly, or perhaps using only a single antivirus solution.  Or maybe they did all that could be reasonably expected of them.  But clearly Fiola is innocent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be a shame if you do not reconsider your decision to dismiss Michael Fiola.  Sticking by a rash, ill-informed decision, rather than showing humility and admitting fault, will tarnish your department and breed ill-will with the public, especially since the story has now been brought to light.  It has had such an affect on me at least.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; YOUR NAME HERE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Peops &#8211; how about sending an e-mail message to the MA DIA in support of Mr. Fiola?  Here&#39;s one I sent &#8211; feel free to plagiarize:</p>
<p>To:  	<a href="mailto:info2@dia.state.ma.us">info2@dia.state.ma.us</a><br />To Whom It May Concern:</p>
<p>I think you should reconsider your stance on Mr. Fiola&#39;s dismissal due to material discovered on his laptop.  As I&#39;m sure you are aware, an article in Monday&#39;s Boston Herald (<a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view/2008_06_16_Ex-official_readies_suit_over_bogus_child_porn_rap/srvc=home&#038;position=7"></a><a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/gener.." rel="nofollow">http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/gener..</a>.) and a widely circulated article by PC Magazine (<a href="http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/guy_gets_fired_and_ruined_for.php"></a><a href="http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/gu.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/06/gu..</a>.) states that Tami Loehrs proved Fiola&#39;s innocence. </p>
<p>It appears that your IT department may in fact be to blame for his laptop&#39;s virus infection &#8211; using a poor antivirus program, not configuring it properly, or perhaps using only a single antivirus solution.  Or maybe they did all that could be reasonably expected of them.  But clearly Fiola is innocent.</p>
<p>It would be a shame if you do not reconsider your decision to dismiss Michael Fiola.  Sticking by a rash, ill-informed decision, rather than showing humility and admitting fault, will tarnish your department and breed ill-will with the public, especially since the story has now been brought to light.  It has had such an affect on me at least.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p> YOUR NAME HERE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
