Print Print

American Taliban Victim: Patrick Kennedy

by Karoli on November 22, 2009

Really, there doesn’t seem to be any limit to their evil. Not only does Catholic Bishop Thomas Tobin bar Rep. Patrick Kennedy from taking Communion (which he’s permitted to do under Catholic doctrine), he does it because Kennedy opposes the official Church stance on health care reform, and threatens any other priest who disobeys him. The only thing missing was the horse’s head.

Only…Patrick Kennedy is a Congressman. If he had bent to the will of the bishops, all of those dire predictions Republicans made about his uncle Jack back in the 60’s would have come to pass. You know. The ones about the Church being in charge, the US being the puppet of Rome, etc. All those.

Mullah Bishop Thomas ‘Taliban‘ Tobin, in his own words:

“He attacked the church, he attacked the position of the church on health care, on abortion, on funding,” Tobin said. “And that required that I respond. I don’t go out looking for these guys. I don’t go out picking these fights.”

Hmmmm. So much for Jesus’ teachings. That’s never stopped the Catholic church before and it surely won’t now. It is repugnant to see this priest publicly question Kennedy’s faith. Once again that prime Taliban characteristic emerges, where one doctrine (the doctrine of men as absolute authority and arbiter of salvation) trumps another (the doctrine of loving one another as Christ loved us).

Bishop Taliban Tobin also couldn’t resist dredging up Rep. Kennedy’s past struggles with drugs and depression, as if to offer Kennedy some excuse for ‘irrational behavior’. If it weren’t real, it would read like one of the worst Mafia movie scripts ever written.

This isn’t his first attack on Kennedy, either. Tobin’s been gunning for him since 2007 because of Kennedy’s anti-church stance on abortion rights. Awfully convenient for him to make it public and ugly on the 46th anniversary of his Uncle Jack Kennedy’s assassination, too.

It really makes the case for a complete (and I do mean complete) separation of church and state. Let’s start by requiring that any church whose leaders inject themselves into the political dialogue by extorting elected representatives with their salvation lose their full tax exemption, and I do mean full. Every last dime, retroactive to their first public statement.

Imagine that. The deficit would disappear in less than a year.

  • Now You're Crying Victim?
    Patrick Kenney is no more a victim of the Catholic Church than you are of Big Business. Patrick is free to choose what he will and will not believe. Patrick does not have to worry about getting his throat slit by a member of the Cotholic Church for not following their rules. What Patrick got two years ago was a private letter from his Bishop telling him that he is not following the rules of the religiion he ascribes to. Patrick chose to expose the letter. That's it. That's all folks. No beheading, no shunning, not even an expulsion. Boy are you melodramatic.
  • I forgot that Patrick Kennedy was the one who publicized the letter, no doubt in order to gain political advantage. He moved this dispute into the public sphere, and so the Church has now responded in the public sphere.

    If Kennedy disagrees with the Catholic church, perhaps he should choose a practice which is more in line with his beliefs? That is why I am not a Catholic, though for other disagreements.

    Surely there must be a church out there that turns a blind eye to abortion advocacy, cocaine, OxyContin and alcohol abuse, sexual assault on waitresses, repeatedly driving drunk, attacking airport guards AND the abuse of power in order to try to cover up each of the above?
  • Now You're Crying Victim?
    Point well placed. Thank you Kyle. I like your posts.
  • It isn't about health care--it is about abortion as it relates to health care reform. The Catholic church is adamantly pro-life and according to their doctrine, they can deny communion to any who opposed church doctrine. I am surprised more elected Democrats haven't been denied.

    That said... I have a big problem with an institutionalized church that makes people dependent on the Church as an institution. I don't remember Jesus saying "Do as the pope says."
  • Had the good Bishop limited his remarks to his right, as an official of the Catholic Church, to denying Rep. Kennedy Communion, I never would have written this post. It was his slimy smear of Kennedy's character, the suggestion that he 'wasn't in his right mind', that his past drug issues were somehow impacting his current decisions ...that's what I found to be utterly reprehensible.
  • Fair point. I do disagree about tax exemption, though. It is not possible for any spiritual leader to preach around politics. Nor should they try. That would be a prior restraint on the free exercise of speech and religion, and a violation of the Constitution.

    To say that a religion can lose tax exempt status based on where their spiritual teachings fall on the political spectrum, would be unconstitutional. If you want to remove tax exemption, you must remove it on all religious institutions. Otherwise their is a perverse incentive for churches to march in lock step with whichever elected politicians hold power. Now THAT is a scary thought!
  • All Christions Unite
    Again, your rehtoric is stupid. It's not unusual for a priest/bishop to advise a parishioner to stop taking communion when the parishioner lives his life in opposition to the church's teaching. Kennedy brought this to light now for political reasons only, because the letter was written two years ago. Kennedy is only using this to promote himself and his policies. You like a lemming follow along blindly and use the latest cry of Christians are just the same as Taliban. Your Christian Bashing continues. . . . Why so smug?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: