<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Option Dead? Or Recrafted?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/</link>
	<description>...politics, pictures, pugs and all that jazz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertBeacon</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51723</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertBeacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51723</guid>
		<description>Good summation of the current possibilities. It would be interesting to see how CBO scores possible savings under this system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summation of the current possibilities. It would be interesting to see how CBO scores possible savings under this system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertBeacon</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51275</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertBeacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51275</guid>
		<description>Good summation of the current possibilities. It would be interesting to see how CBO scores possible savings under this system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summation of the current possibilities. It would be interesting to see how CBO scores possible savings under this system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesertBeacon</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51244</link>
		<dc:creator>DesertBeacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51244</guid>
		<description>Good summation of the current possibilities. It would be interesting to see how CBO scores possible savings under this system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summation of the current possibilities. It would be interesting to see how CBO scores possible savings under this system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51239</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51239</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Identica by karoli: New blog post: Public Option Dead? Or Recrafted? http://ur1.ca/he0d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Identica by karoli: New blog post: Public Option Dead? Or Recrafted? <a href="http://ur1.ca/he0d.." rel="nofollow">http://ur1.ca/he0d..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Public Option Dead? Or Recrafted? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51238</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Public Option Dead? Or Recrafted? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51238</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shoq Values, Karoli, Patt H., Billie Raven, Linda Salter and others. Linda Salter said: RT @tweetmeme Public Option Dead? Or Recrafted? http://bit.ly/6KSsZA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shoq Values, Karoli, Patt H., Billie Raven, Linda Salter and others. Linda Salter said: RT @tweetmeme Public Option Dead? Or Recrafted? <a href="http://bit.ly/6KSsZA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6KSsZA</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dotlizard</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51243</link>
		<dc:creator>dotlizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51243</guid>
		<description>Well, this is actually good, and it actually looks like it&#039;ll cost me what I estimated back a few dozen estimates ago, which is to say, an additional $500/mo over what I am paying now. Which is fine really. Current situation is that I have excellent insurance, and my domestic partner (I&#039;ve been living with my son&#039;s father for 19 years. I won&#039;t marry him. Long story) has horrible insurance with dependent coverage that would -- maybe -- pay if there were bills over $5K for either of them. However that goes away after the first of the year because he&#039;s quitting his part time job to run a small nonprofit corp (no benefits). Meaning I have to add them both, which ... well, even if we went the option figured on the PDF thingy you were pointed to, would be the same as me adding them to my excellent coverage. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was actually better to handle the out of pocket for the two of them myself with the huge deductible policy, I spend a lot less than $6K a year that way. But i can&#039;t go high-deductible, because I am one of those $1K/month med people (my generic Adderall costs a lot more than yours, maybe because it&#039;s 2/day?). And I can&#039;t split and pay one kind for them and one for me. And since, technically, I CAN insure them both, I WILL have to. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which is fine. I will need to make more money, but by next year, I will, so it&#039;s all good. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I start looking for jobs in France. Naah, j/k, I wouldn&#039;t do that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*ahem* anyone want to write me a recommendation on LinkedIn? Even better if it&#039;s written in French?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is actually good, and it actually looks like it&#39;ll cost me what I estimated back a few dozen estimates ago, which is to say, an additional $500/mo over what I am paying now. Which is fine really. Current situation is that I have excellent insurance, and my domestic partner (I&#39;ve been living with my son&#39;s father for 19 years. I won&#39;t marry him. Long story) has horrible insurance with dependent coverage that would &#8212; maybe &#8212; pay if there were bills over $5K for either of them. However that goes away after the first of the year because he&#39;s quitting his part time job to run a small nonprofit corp (no benefits). Meaning I have to add them both, which &#8230; well, even if we went the option figured on the PDF thingy you were pointed to, would be the same as me adding them to my excellent coverage. </p>
<p>It was actually better to handle the out of pocket for the two of them myself with the huge deductible policy, I spend a lot less than $6K a year that way. But i can&#39;t go high-deductible, because I am one of those $1K/month med people (my generic Adderall costs a lot more than yours, maybe because it&#39;s 2/day?). And I can&#39;t split and pay one kind for them and one for me. And since, technically, I CAN insure them both, I WILL have to. </p>
<p>Which is fine. I will need to make more money, but by next year, I will, so it&#39;s all good. </p>
<p>While I start looking for jobs in France. Naah, j/k, I wouldn&#39;t do that. </p>
<p>*ahem* anyone want to write me a recommendation on LinkedIn? Even better if it&#39;s written in French?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dotlizard</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51724</link>
		<dc:creator>dotlizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51724</guid>
		<description>Well, this is actually good, and it actually looks like it&#039;ll cost me what I estimated back a few dozen estimates ago, which is to say, an additional $500/mo over what I am paying now. Which is fine really. Current situation is that I have excellent insurance, and my domestic partner (I&#039;ve been living with my son&#039;s father for 19 years. I won&#039;t marry him. Long story) has horrible insurance with dependent coverage that would -- maybe -- pay if there were bills over $5K for either of them. However that goes away after the first of the year because he&#039;s quitting his part time job to run a small nonprofit corp (no benefits). Meaning I have to add them both, which ... well, even if we went the option figured on the PDF thingy you were pointed to, would be the same as me adding them to my excellent coverage. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was actually better to handle the out of pocket for the two of them myself with the huge deductible policy, I spend a lot less than $6K a year that way. But i can&#039;t go high-deductible, because I am one of those $1K/month med people (my generic Adderall costs a lot more than yours, maybe because it&#039;s 2/day?). And I can&#039;t split and pay one kind for them and one for me. And since, technically, I CAN insure them both, I WILL have to. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which is fine. I will need to make more money, but by next year, I will, so it&#039;s all good. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I start looking for jobs in France. Naah, j/k, I wouldn&#039;t do that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*ahem* anyone want to write me a recommendation on LinkedIn? Even better if it&#039;s written in French?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is actually good, and it actually looks like it&#39;ll cost me what I estimated back a few dozen estimates ago, which is to say, an additional $500/mo over what I am paying now. Which is fine really. Current situation is that I have excellent insurance, and my domestic partner (I&#39;ve been living with my son&#39;s father for 19 years. I won&#39;t marry him. Long story) has horrible insurance with dependent coverage that would &#8212; maybe &#8212; pay if there were bills over $5K for either of them. However that goes away after the first of the year because he&#39;s quitting his part time job to run a small nonprofit corp (no benefits). Meaning I have to add them both, which &#8230; well, even if we went the option figured on the PDF thingy you were pointed to, would be the same as me adding them to my excellent coverage. </p>
<p>It was actually better to handle the out of pocket for the two of them myself with the huge deductible policy, I spend a lot less than $6K a year that way. But i can&#39;t go high-deductible, because I am one of those $1K/month med people (my generic Adderall costs a lot more than yours, maybe because it&#39;s 2/day?). And I can&#39;t split and pay one kind for them and one for me. And since, technically, I CAN insure them both, I WILL have to. </p>
<p>Which is fine. I will need to make more money, but by next year, I will, so it&#39;s all good. </p>
<p>While I start looking for jobs in France. Naah, j/k, I wouldn&#39;t do that. </p>
<p>*ahem* anyone want to write me a recommendation on LinkedIn? Even better if it&#39;s written in French?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindadapper</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51242</link>
		<dc:creator>lindadapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51242</guid>
		<description>excellent post.  after OMB sores it we will know how many people it will help. Sanders said that ther are some good things.  Hopefully the good will out weigh the bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent post.  after OMB sores it we will know how many people it will help. Sanders said that ther are some good things.  Hopefully the good will out weigh the bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindadapper</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51725</link>
		<dc:creator>lindadapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51725</guid>
		<description>excellent post.  after OMB sores it we will know how many people it will help. Sanders said that ther are some good things.  Hopefully the good will out weigh the bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent post.  after OMB sores it we will know how many people it will help. Sanders said that ther are some good things.  Hopefully the good will out weigh the bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/comment-page-1/#comment-51241</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/12/08/public-option-dead-or-recrafted/#comment-51241</guid>
		<description>I wondered if they would try the &quot;soft shoe&quot; to get around the opposition and it looks like they have. Excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered if they would try the &#8220;soft shoe&#8221; to get around the opposition and it looks like they have. Excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

