Print Print

On leaving the left, compromise, and dialogue

by Karoli on December 9, 2009

First thing this morning before the coffee machine died and the phone started ringing off the hook with surprise distractions, there was a twitter direct message in my inbox. All it said was “Read this.” It was Andrew Sullivan’s collection of posts written by frustrated Democrats mirroring those written about leaving the right, decrying the absolutism, entrenchment, and obstructionist views that are equally visible on both sides of the aisle.

Nowhere was this more evident than after the President’s Afghanistan speech. And what frustrated me most about the dialogue was that there was absolutely no compromise, no budging, just complete and utter entrenchment.

There is this strange belief that seems to prevail amongst some that if it’s not absolute, it’s not worthy.

This is not how politics works. Let me offer some examples. If politics were absolute:

  • Social Security would be privatized
  • 401k plans would not exist, nor would employer-sponsored pension plans
  • Medicare would have been implemented for all Americans in 1965
  • Medicare would have been completely privatized instead of only partially.
  • No COBRA subsidies for laid-off workers would have been given

US History proves the price for progress. It took a civil war to end slavery, though that war was as much about economics and the emergent industrial superiority of the North as it was about slavery. After ending slavery, it took another HUNDRED years to even BEGIN to march toward equality.

Politics is not absolute, and it’s not absolute because there are extremes on both sides of an issue with the majority falling somewhere in the middle. The beauty of this is that the extremes push each other and a center emerges clearly.

There is no clearer example of this than comparing the list of legislative health care heroes with the list of those who oppose the climate/cap-and-trade legislation. Jay Rockefeller, progressive health care champion. Al Franken, Minnesota junior senator. Health care heroes. Cap and trade? Not so much.

This is because they represent areas and constituents whose interests do not rest in the arms of climate legislation. Like it or not, they are there to represent.

But I digress. I started this post because I get angry down to my core when I see the so-called ‘voices of the left’ slamming the President, threatening to strip their Obama sticker (thank you, Tom Hayden), and generally offering talking points to the Republicans, which they are happy to take and use on the Senate floor. (Thank you, Howard Dean). When David Sirota compares supporters of the President to the KKK and Jane Hamsher can barely contain her disdain, when young progressives start shouting that they’ve been sold out because the formal term “public option” is now shifting to the same thing in a different coat, more refined and with more potential to actually benefit them but because it’s not a public option it’s somehow a sellout…

I’m left speechless.

Seriously speechless. Idealism is terrific. I’m an idealist when I look through a camera lens. When I watch Congress, it’s time to put my pragmatic cap on and figure out what will fly.

Enough rambling. I’ll end with this. At 4pm today, I was sure health care reform was dead on the Senate floor. Given Ben Nelson’s promise to oppose any bill without the coathanger provisions, given that those coathanger provisions were soundly defeated and tabled (rightly so!), it appeared to me that sixty votes for the bill as it was right then was unlikely. Combine that with the daily hammering of the Republicans over Medicare Advantage, the scare seniors tactics, the usual onslaught of commercials with utterly bizarre messages about racism and health care reform, and the angry, angry tone of progressives’ email in my inbox, I figured we were done. Worse, I attributed that doneness to the left, who it seemed to me, were absolutely entrenched.

Now we have a compromise that actually beefs up what was there yesterday, and so effectively hems in Republicans (particularly Snowe and Collins) that we might actually get sixty votes for cloture. Hot damn, rock on.

And yet, what I see from the left is the same battle cry. It’s not single payer, it’s not a ‘public option’, it’s not, it’s not, it’s not, and dammit we’re gonna lose ground in the 2010 elections.

Not so much, unless the pie-in-the-sky politics is all words, no action. You want progressives? Elect them. The very worst thing anyone on the left can do is stay home. If that happens, you’ll get the representation you deserve.

In the meantime, call me a pragmatic Democrat. Flexible with certain dealbreakers. I’d have called for a kill if the coathanger amendment passed. It didn’t. I’d have called for a kill if pre-existing conditions exclusions were retained in any form. It doesn’t.

Whatever. Stomping feet and shouting sellout and hating on the folks who are supposed to be on our side seems like a really bad bet to me — little like reining up the race horse 10 feet before the finish.

Bonus link: The value of President Obama’s management style

  • Ruth Ann Genne
    I was told that when I got older I would become more conservative. Well, I am older now (older than dirt) and I have not become more conservative. I have , however, become more pragmatic. A lot of this pragmatism stems from the realization that while we lefties sit and argue about the purity of our politics a lot of real people are being affected a lot by what we see as incremental change. I have seen this happen time and time again in my previous life as a social worker. I totally agree with everything you are saying up there. We need to do what works- because that is more important than any ideology.
    I am a former third party voter ( hey, I used to live in San Francisco where liberal was considered too wishy washy) who realized that I was throwing away more than my vote- I was totally screwing people who lives were being affected very much by what I saw as too little moving leftward. We need to keep the conversation to the left but we need to get behind what may seem, to us like very little changes in the right( or rather left) direction. It is how we have gotten this far over the past hundred years. The revolution is not about to happen-not now, not in any foreseeable future. We need to work for the folks whose lives would be negatively impacted by the right being in control. And believe me,many people hurt when they are in control.
    Be patient folks. Change happens slowly. We can't ignore those to whom small changes will have a lot of impact. To drop out of the game to protect some sort of ideological correctness is incredibly elitist.
  • I want to frame your comment and etch it with gold. You are so on the money with all of it. Thank you for saying so.
  • Just because we are liberal and Democrat, doesn't mean we are going to toe the line on everything our government representatives come up with. Sitting on our hands and not speaking up fervently is what got us neck deep in the mess over the last 8 years.

    Republicans and conservatives may be reactionary and dull witted but they sure know how to kick up a fuss and get their point of view heard. They're not shy when they think their wants and needs aren't being taken care of.

    Why should Liberals and democrats settle for less? Why should we sit with our lips pressed together if we feel like we are being sold down the river and ignored?

    Just because I dissent with President Obama doesn't mean I don't support him in general. People who desert the President because he goes a different route than they prefer are dispicable and unrealistic in my opinion. If that's all it takes to abandon someone, good riddence. We need fighters not weak kneed give upers.
  • My issue isn't with raising issues and pushing for them. It is the judgment that drives me nuts. Before details are out, it's "Reid sold out younger for older" (open salvo in generational wars), "Obama is a Republican in Democrats' clothing", etc. Those judgments do real harm with no benefit.
  • From what I can tell @Karoli, in politics, the details are never all the way out. Except maybe a generation later after most of the major players have passed on or long retired.

    If we, the American citizens always waited for the dust to completely settle, we'd never get the chance to influence policy while it's being written. Without thousands of progressive people hammering their Congresspeople over the past year, the Republicans and other health care lackeys would have swept the reform discussion under the rug. People spoke up and let our representatives know that business as usual wasn't acceptable.

    I agree that they way people show they are dissatisfied, ex. "Obama is a Republican in Democrats' clothing", is extreme at times. Maybe I'm naive but when people see the results of all the hard, ugly decisions, they'll rethink their harsh judgments.
  • lelawilley
    My thoughts expressed very eloquently and factually. Haven't kept up with a lot because have been so busy but make time to read a few people's posts and twitter to try to keep up on the debate. Keep up the work.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: