Vic Chesnutt: Free of Hope

by Karoli on December 26, 2009 · 12 comments

At 18, Vic Chesnutt drove drunk. That choice consigned him to a future in a wheelchair with limited use of his hands and arms, but with a powerful voice which rang strong until December 23rd. On that night, Vic Chesnutt opened a bottle of muscle relaxants and swallowed them all.

He died on Christmas Day.

It was no secret that he was stressed and depressed by his medical bills, by the prospect of not getting treatment he needed because he couldn’t afford it, by feeling as though he was facing insurmountable physical, financial and emotional challenges.

But there’s an albatross that follows Chesnutt from the door of his home to every show he plays. Though he’s currently insured, an accumulating stream of nearly $70,000 worth of unpaid hospital bills is threatening to swallow much of his livelihood as a songwriter. It’s left him in an unprecedented condition — one where he’s at a loss for words.

“I’m not too eloquent talking about these things,” Chesnutt said. “I was making payments, but I can’t anymore and I really have no idea what I’m going to do. It seems absurd they can charge this much. When I think about all this, it gets me so furious. I could die tomorrow because of other operations I need that I can’t afford. I could die any day now, but I don’t want to pay them another nickel.”

Those feelings are deeply ingrained in “At the Cut,” where almost every song offers at least a sideways glance at creeping mortality. Take, for instance, “Flirted With You All My Life,” an incandescent country tune that’s a kind of a breakup letter to Chesnutt’s own thoughts of ending his life.

To all of those who want to keep telling me how much health care reform sucks, I say:

Tell it to Vic Chesnutt’s family and friends. Tell them how different it might have been for him not to have been excluded from coverage because he was stupid at age 18 and now is uninsurable. Tell them how much it would have sucked for him to pay next to nothing for the security of knowing he wouldn’t be $70,000 in debt.

When the critics, showstoppers and billkillers cry out about how burdensome it might be to take on $100/month to sleep at night (or $300/month in our family’s case), to end the incessant ringing of the telephone and the midnight hunts for change that fell into the sofa to make up the difference between buying a dozen eggs and medications or just medications…

I want to scream. I don’t know how many times I have to say this, but I’ll try again in the hopes that someone will hear me this time:

Ending discrimination against the sick, disabled, and infirm in our society is REFORM, folks. Period.

Having help from the government to pay for insurance coverage so we can actually get health care without losing it all is REFORM. PROGRESSIVE REFORM.

To all of you who cry “Sellout! Obama’s a sellout!”, I say this:

For sixty years Presidents have sought an end to medical discrimination. Had Ted Kennedy been more of a “sellout” in 1974, we might have single payer today. Had Bill Clinton been more of a “sellout” in 1994, we might be debating single payer today.

Had Barack Obama been uncompromising, Vic Chesnutt would have been the first of many to free themselves of the “hope” of serving in bondage to medical bills for the rest of their lives.

This issue hits near and dear to me. As the mother of a musician who will have two chronic conditions for the rest of his life, I can see into a crystal ball and call the future for him.

One future would have meant abandoning his gifts and his dreams to work for a corporation that would have covered him on their group insurance. The same corporations, by the way, that purists rail against.

The other future is one where he can remain a self-employed musician, pursue his dream, make music to calm and inspire, to energize and to relax, to gift others with his gifts, and teach and inspire other young musicians to greater heights without fearing total loss of everything he’s worked for, or selling his drums to pay for his meds.

Those seeking to undermine and minimize the significant reforms we now will have to our health care system should first count to 60, and tell me how we got there via a different path. Then they should face Vic Chesnutt’s family and friends, and then they can come explain it to me face to face.

It’s awfully pretty theory, you know. The theory of the pure, the attraction to the perfect. It’s lovely, until you find yourself face down in a gutter with dirt being piled on your back, creditors gnawing at every waking moment, and still…you are not well. You are not healthy, and you have no real prospect to get healthy because the doors to the system we have right now do not welcome those who are ill, but only those who are not ill.

All of a sudden theory turns to the stone of reality, and in Vic Chesnutt’s case, he was freed of hope. May he be the last to be so afflicted, and may he rest in peace. All my sympathy goes out to his family and friends.

I invite all of the pursuers of purity to take a moment of silence to remember the rest of us in the dirty ditch called reality.

free of hope
free of the past
thank you God of Nothing
I’m free at last

free of hope
free of the past
thank you God of Nothing
I’m free at last
I’m free at last
I’m free, free at last

Postscript here: “…he was in the middle of a desperate search for help. The system failed to provide it.” Systems are people, and governments, and people and community. Community. Yet it seems that community in these modern times does not extend to actually helping. Only judging. At least, that’s what I read in the commentary.

  • so sad

    Chestnutt's quote sums up what every average American will be saying…
    “I’m not too eloquent talking about these things,” Chesnutt said. “I was making payments, but I can’t anymore and I really have no idea what I’m going to do. It seems absurd they can charge this much. When I think about all this, it gets me so furious. I could die tomorrow because of other operations I need that I can’t afford. I could die any day now, but I don’t want to pay them another nickel.”

    Karoli, you're talking out of both sides of your mouth and don't seem to know it. His quote will be all of our quotes sooner than later if this Obamacare Bill is passed.

    You just do not get it.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Vic Chesnutt: Free of Hope -- Topsy.com

  • Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  • http://www.coffeefiltertv.com Kyle Sellers

    The story of Vic Chestnutt should be told to more people. But not not as a sad story to push for reform–it should be a cautionary tale that demonstrates the consequences of driving drunk. Had he been the victim of a drunk driver, that would be a different story. As it stands though, there is only one person responsible for his rough life and for his eventual death–Vic Chestnutt.

    Now, I know that drunk driving is a forgivable offense to some (hell, Rick Sanchez at CNN killed a man while drunk and fled the scene and he's a favorite of the left), but my family has suffered 4 deaths at the hands of drunk drivers, so I have little sympathy. It's not just being stupid at 18, it's willfully putting others at risk. Would you feel differently about this story if he had killed a family in the accident that left him crippled? Because it is nothing but chance that resulted in him being the only casualty.

    But the REAL question is, why should everyone else have to pay for this man's self inflicted injuries? Why should we as a society foot the bill for Vic Chestnutt's $70,000 in bills as a result of his drunk driving? Why should he have the privilege of being supported by the state? Should we rush to congratulate (with our checkbooks out) a man who shoots himself in the foot in order to get a handicapped parking pass? Should a person who throws himself in front of a bus in an attempted suicide and ends up wheelchair bound for life, be supported by people who go out and work hard and live responsibly?

    I'm not saying “he had it coming” or anything like that. I'm saying that a self inflicted injury does not deserve the pity or the financial assistance of society. And stories like this are just one more reason why 18 year old kids SHOULD NOT DRINK AND DRIVE. Hopefully some young fans of his will learn that lesson.

  • http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/ Karoli

    Kyle, I'm really glad that you didn't do anything stupid at age 18 that left you dependent on others. Here's a guy who overcame his stupidity enough to at least give us some decent (if depressive) music, and you say he doesn't deserve help? Wow, so much for humankindness.

  • http://bastardlogic.wordpress.com matttbastard

    I'm not saying “he had it coming” or anything like that.

    Bullshit. Bull-fucking-shit.

    That's exactly what you're saying. About a man whose body isn't even cold. Whose family and friends are currently beside themselves with mourning. Whose widow has now inherited those medical bills and the ongoing litigation that Chesnutt was facing.

    And you want to reduce this man's expansive artistic and personal legacy into a PSA against drunk driving? Really?

    I think that says a whole hell of a lot more about you, your apparent severe emotional retardation, and your utterly perverted sense of priorities than it does about any sins Chesnutt committed during his all-too-brief time in this mortal coil.

  • http://www.coffeefiltertv.com Kyle Sellers

    He deserves help, and anyone who wishes to is more than welcome to help him. He does not deserve to be able to push the consequences of his actions off on others. I applaud anyone who would've stepped in and helped him out.

    But that is not what this is about. You're suggesting that someone else should pick up the tab for him, to the tune of $70,000. I can think of a lot of better uses for $70,000 than paying for some guys self-inflicted injuries.

  • http://www.coffeefiltertv.com Kyle Sellers

    I'm not the one who brought this up “before his body is even cold.” Karoli tried to make a martyr/hero out of him and I responded. I'm sorry, but treating drunk-drivers is about the lowest item on my list of priorities for health reform.

    How about we work on covering people who are truly deserving of assistance before we start worrying about people who injured themselves while endangering the lives of others?

  • So Sad

    We have a system in place to help those in Chestnutt's position. It's called charity. Churches have been notorious for fundraising and donating money, time and talent to causes like Chestnutt's. Charity should be applauded and encouraged right now as an alternative to compulsory payments to pay others bills. Give from an overflowing heart. Government is to be limited. Charity in abundance.
    Philanthropy, donations, etc.

  • http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/ Karoli

    “Are there no workhouses? No prisons? Then let them die, and decrease the
    surplus population.”

    Dickens loves that philosophy.

  • So Sad

    Dickens was in fact opposed to that philosophy. His main character (whom you have quoted) awakens to charity in a joyful, abundant, careless way. His character did not go to the government and demand that they tax the people. No, he himself saw the light and gave from his own abundance, not from compulsion, but from the profound understanding of humanity that was pointed out to him from three spirits. The last line in the story from the character with the most physcially deserving ailment says with joy, “God Bless Everyone” The private citizen (Scrooge) opens his own wallet and generously donates his money to this family in need and gives Tiny Tim's father the living wage he deserves.
    Government taxation and pilphoring was not implied as a good thing in this story. Creating slush funds for elected officials was not embraced. Scrooge wasn't cutting deals with city officials, etc., etc., etc.

  • So Sad

    Dickens was in fact opposed to that philosophy. His main character (whom you have quoted) awakens to charity in a joyful, abundant, careless way. His character did not go to the government and demand that they tax the people. No, he himself saw the light and gave from his own abundance, not from compulsion, but from the profound understanding of humanity that was pointed out to him from three spirits. The last line in the story from the character with the most physcially deserving ailment says with joy, “God Bless Everyone” The private citizen (Scrooge) opens his own wallet and generously donates his money to this family in need and gives Tiny Tim's father the living wage he deserves.
    Government taxation and pilphoring was not implied as a good thing in this story. Creating slush funds for elected officials was not embraced. Scrooge wasn't cutting deals with city officials, etc., etc., etc.

Previous post:

Next post: