Joe Lieberman Endorses Coakley!!! (read on…)

by Karoli on January 18, 2010 · 4 comments

Gotcha. You shouldn’t believe everything you read on the Internet. If you did, you might believe that Joe Lieberman had endorsed Scott Brown in Massachusetts. Never mind that such an endorsement would be ridiculous for Lieberman to make, given that his fortunes rest better with Democrats than Republicans regardless of the Massachusetts outcome.

Actually, Lieberman has no plans to make an endorsement at all. That’s a smart move on his part, since anything Lieberman does would make it more difficult for Martha Coakley. No one thinks much of Joe these days.

The right wing has grown quite savvy about how to spin propaganda, use Twitter and Facebook to create fact out of fiction, and with the full cooperation of sites claiming to be “crowdsourced journalism”.

Here’s how it works. There’s a site out there called “Before It’s News”. It’s run by an anonymous owner called “Little Blue Marble, LLC”. The LLC registration points back to a home in Kentfield, CA. From their “About” page:

Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

No vetting, no corroboration, no…nothing. Here’s how it goes:

  • On January 15th, a community member posts a story with this SEO-ready title: “Joe Lieberman Endorsement Scott Brown Latest Polls Show Widening Lead”
  • It’s clearly a Republican shill piece as are the other ‘non-stories’ posted by Anonymous
  • The story is then dropped into Twitter as fact. I have seen it repeated by disheartened and angry Democrats many times over the last two days.

All hail crowdsourced news. Or not. This is a perfect example of an irresponsible use of collaboration on the Internet. It would not surprise me to discover this “Before It’s News” site was created as the hatching-place for right-wing rumormongering, with the Brown-Coakley race being the first experiment.

Collaboration is a wonderful thing, when it’s fact-based. When the Internet is used to send rumors flying around at light-speed, it’s a disaster. The ONLY defense is for users to look at the source, to see if it’s corroborated with a trustworthy source (such as Lieberman himself), and then choose NOT to spread rumors that are clearly just planted.

Anyone can publish anything on the Internet, anonymous or identified. Users and readers need to use their own common sense to decide whether it’s worth repeating. Otherwise we’re nothing more than propaganda-spinners playing with people’s minds and futures.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Joe Lieberman Endorses Coakley!!! (read on…) -- Topsy.com

  • krisd

    This has been rampant with the Mass. Senate Election. Example: Fox News reports that Obama couldn't fill a small hall and that Scott Brown's rally was a bigger draw. Fox neglected to mention the 1000s of people who watched in overflow rooms and lined up down the block. Hundreds of folks on twitter are still repeating this false story.

  • http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/ Karoli

    Kris, worse yet, they've got bots set up to shoot the rumors far and wide. Lots and lots of bots. Tons of them. One of the posts I wrote about Lieberman was picked up and sent around Twitter for days by their bots. They use Fox News to start the rumor, then game the system by sending it around via bot to a zillion followers, etc. It's really ugly, perfectly legal, but relies upon the cynical belief that people will not actually question what they read.

  • Bin Quick

    The reason Why Progressive are Against Health Care Reform: http://binquick.blogspot.com/2010/01/progressiv…

Previous post:

Next post: