Print Print

Here’s why the Senate bill has to pass AS IS

by Karoli on January 22, 2010

Simply put: It is the only way to get the consumer protections into place. That’s it. Period.

There is no other way. I’ve seen some interesting ideas about pulling out consumer protections and passing those separately. Let’s see how that works:

Scenario 1 – Isolate consumer protections in new bill

  1. House crafts a bill with only consumer protections included. House debates, passes bill.
  2. Bill goes to Senate. Senate takes up the bill after they get that cloture vote. You know, the one they can get with 59. Why a cloture vote? Because sending it back re-opens debate, and all the old procedures (60 to reopen debate, 60 to close debate, etc) apply.
  3. Consumer protections die.

Scenario 2 – New bill for consumer protections, reconciliation route for revenue items

  1. House crafts a bill with watered-down consumer protections. (pre-existing conditions ban, rescissions, guaranteed issue are considered consumer protections)
  2. House tries to ram through a public option via reconciliation. Only those provisions which have a direct impact on the budget may be considered via this process; e.g. subsidies, Medicare reforms, the “Cadillac tax”, etc.
  3. Consumer protections die in the filibuster
  4. Somehow Senate manages to pull out 51 for the public option, it passes, goes to the President.
  5. People with pre-existing conditions wait until 2013 when public option finally comes online. They pay 5 times what any insured pays for private insurance because the sick, desperate people who cannot get insurance any other way have no option but to turn to the public option, ballooning the budget and handing a political football over to Republicans.

Scenario 3 – Carve up the whole thing into smaller pieces, add Medicare for All

  1. House lets Senate bill die.
  2. House tries to carve it up into smaller pieces, debates, passes consumer protections.
  3. Senate lets them die.
  4. Somehow via reconciliation, House expands Medicare.
  5. Medicare goes bankrupt in 5 years because none of the other Medicare reforms were passed and so we’re faced with bailing out Medicare, playing right into Republicans’ claim that government-run healthcare cannot succeed.
  6. Sick people pay 5x as much for Medicare.

There’s a bunch of moving parts here. A whole bunch. So when Howard Dean and Jane Hamsher and Chris Van Hollen say the Senate bill is dead, what they are really doing is KILLING HEALTH CARE REFORM ALTOGETHER.

Call Congress. Please.

Update: One additional scenario has emerged this evening.

House puts thru bill via reconciliation, then passes Senate bill

From this post:

  1. House prepares reconciliation bill with key provisions at issue, passes and sends to Senate.
  2. Senate makes slight changes to it (pre-approved by House), sends back to House.
  3. House takes up revised reconciliation measure and Senate bill at that time, passes both.

This scenario emerges out of what appears to be a lack of trust on the part of the Houses that the Senate will undertake reconciliation measures in good faith. Of course, it also means they’re asking the public to trust some pretty complex and edgy procedures. I only see this happening if they put it on a fast track in both House. No delays, no recesses, nothing that can hold things up.

  • .@Karoli: And now, we have "House passes Senate bill, and puts thru fixes via reconciliation." Who'da thunk it? (re: your 1/22 blogpost)
  • Can the House just pass the Senate's version of the Bill then walk it up to the President's desk? Getting the votes would be difficult but possible.
  • They can, but progressives are balky because they don't know how to justify voting to approve it when they're facing re-election. that last option at the bottom seems to be getting a head of steam as a face-saving, bill-strengthening compromise that's win-win.
  • VotingPrecinct368cor
    Enough is enough, the American people are tired of the gimmicks and trillions in spending and if you all really cared about health, why do you allow corporations to continually poison the food supply like Monsanto with genetic modified products? Why is it that companies promote vaccine all over local communites as if it were candy yet we have 1 in 95 children experiencing autism? Sorry but that is all we need is yet one more insult to the intelligence of the American people to allow more regulation and corporation to charge more disease to the American people. You are all fired.
  • I will pass that on to my college-aged diabetic son whose current costs are well over $1000/month. I'm sure he'll appreciate those thoughts.
  • I'm guessing Scenario 2 is the most likely. Other scenarios definitely exist; it's a matter of our perspective and individual/collective concerns. Not much time left...
  • Jen,

    They just need to finish it. Get some balls and finish it.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: